Low Molecular-weight Heparin for the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke

Clinical Question

Is low-molecular weight heparin efficacious in reducing morbidity and mortality in patients with acute ischemic strokes?

Clinical Bottom Line

  1. There is a small, but statistically significant, decrease in the risk of death at 3 and 6 months if treatment with LMWH is used for ischemic stroke started within the first 48 hours.
  2. There is a larger, statistically significant decrease in the degree of physical dependency and increase in the degree of physical independence at 3 and 6 months.

The Evidence

Risk of Death, Relative Risk Reduction, and Number Needed to Treat at 3 months follow-up

Risk of Death RRR ARR NNT
Placebo 14.3%
Low-dose LMWH 14.9% -0.06 -0.006 NA
High-dose LMWH 12.0% 0.16 0.023 43

Risk of Death, Relative Risk Reduction, and Number Needed to Treat at 6 months follow-up

Risk of Death RRR ARR NNT
Placebo 19%
Low-dose LMWH 16.8% 0.12 0.022 45
High-dose LMWH 13.0% 0.32 0.06 17

Total Risk of Hemorrhagic Transformation (on follow-up CT)

Hemorrhage Risk Risk Difference Number needed to Treat
Placebo 12.0%
Low-dose LMWH 9.0% -0.03 33
High-dose LMWH 6.0% -0.06 17

Poor versus Good Outcomes at 3 and 6 months

3 months Good Outcome (%) Poor Outcome (%) RR (95%CI) for Poor Outcome
Placebo 36 64
Low-dose 40 60 0.95 (0.76-1.17)
High-dose 47 53 0.83 (0.66-1.05)
6 months
Placebo 35 65
Low-dose 48 52 0.81 (0.64-1.02)
High-dose 55 45 0.69 (0.54-0.90)

Comments

  1. This was a well-designed study and is valid according to the JAMA guidelines for articles on therapy.
  2. Data analysis was fairly rigorous.
  3. The results and conclusions of this study may not be applicable to all patients as the study patients were not representative of the population in general (they were all Chinese).
  4. Although the authors internally validate their assessment method, and compare it to the Barthel Index (calculating their sensitivity and specificity), this was not a diagnostic study. The mode of assessment is subject to both patient/caregiver recall bias and interviewer bias.
  5. The only group that shows a benefit that is statistically powerful is the group treated with high-dose LMWH at 6 months; this groups RR was 0.69, and the CI excluded a RR of 1. An ARR of 0.10 is calculated for this group with a NNT of 10 to prevent one poor outcome. However, this is only true if you combine, as the authors do, alive (but dependent) patients and death. Excluding dependency, and looking only at risk of death, 43 patients need to be treated in the high dose group to prevent one death at 3 months and 17 to prevent one death at 6 months (45 and 33, respectively for the low dose group at 3 and 6 months). The risk of hemorrhagic transformation (in terms of number needed to harm) is far from substantial. In fact, these results indicate a protective effect on hemorrhagic transformation -- 17 for the high-dose group and 33 for the low dose group need to be treated to prevent a hemorrhagic transformation. Taking this into consideration increases the overall qualitative treatment effect.
  6. Over 2,400 patients were excluded from this study for various reasons, leaving just over 10% included in the study. This raises concern about the clinical significance of this study and the application of its results.
  7. No information is given about whether all three groups had equal percentages of patients on secondary prophylaxis (aspirin).
  8. Despite the statistically significant decrease in poor outcomes reported by the authors, this reviewer cannot recommend this therapy as routine treatment for all patients with acute ischemic stroke in light of the above comments.

Appraised by: Patrick J. Sousa, MD

DATE: April 5, 1996

Kay R, et al. Low-molecular Weight Heparin for the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke. NEJM 1995;333:1588-1593.